Dawson, V. K., and C. S. Kolar, editors. 2003. Integrated management techniques to control nonnative fishes.U.S. Geological Survey, Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center, La Crosse, Wisconsin, December 2003.146 pp. Appendixes A F ABSTRACT Many species of native fish from the southwestern United States, including those in the GilaRiver basin in Arizona and New Mexico, are critically imperiled in part because of theintroduction and establishment of nonnative fishes. Effective methods for eradication andcontrol of nonnative fishes are needed to rehabilitate the imperiled native fish fauna of the GilaRiver basin. The objective of this report is to assess the potential of applying techniques ofintegrated pest management to protect imperiled native fishes in the southwestern United Statesfrom invasive nonnative species. To accomplish this, reviews of pertinent literature wereconducted in selected topic areas and the information presented in a series of chapters todocument findings. Subject areas of the review included (1) life-history strategies for bothnative and nonnative species in those waters; (2) evaluation, identification, and characteristics ofsuccessful integrated pest management programs; (3) identification of potential and existingchemicals and appropriate chemical formulations for use as general and selective piscicides; and(4) procedures and costs associated with the discovery and development of new and perhapstaxon-specific piscicides. Characteristics of native fishes of concern were compared with thoseof nonnative fishes, and the geographic ranges of native and nonnative fishes were mapped toidentify potentially vulnerable conditions around which control strategies could be developed. The concept of chemical receptors and receptor responses are presented to help explain the basisof selective toxicity. A total of 45 chemicals were identified that have either been used aspiscicides, or are currently in various stages of development. A rating system was developedthat evaluates the usefulness of these chemicals in resolving problems caused by nonnativefishes. Only five of the chemicals (antimycin, rotenone, TFM, Bayluscide , and Squoxin)achieved ratings of 75 or greater out of a possible score of 100. Chemical reclamations have notalways been successful as indicated by reviews of hundreds of fish control projects with reportedsuccesses ranging from 43% to 82%. It is unlikely that the present arsenal of approved selectivepiscicides would be effective for controlling nonnative fishes in the southwestern United Statesbecause the fish communities are different from most areas where selective piscicides are beingused, and the currently registered taxon selective piscicides target sea lampreys. Acomprehensive list of formulations and associated delivery systems for applying registeredpiscicides are presented. The development of new chemical tools for selectively managing fishpopulations may be facilitated by the knowledge of the mode of action of candidate piscicidesand their structure-toxicity relationships. An evaluation of the costs and benefits of chemicaltreatments, as well as the cost associated with the development and registration of newpiscicides, are provided. Reclamation of habitats that are critically imperiled by invasive fishesmay need to be implemented using general piscicides such as antimycin or rotenone. This wouldrequire that important extant native species be temporarily moved to refugia until after thetreatments. In less critical situations, efforts could be directed toward development of integratedpest management techniques that include development and use of barriers, water-levelmanipulations, targeted overharvest, stocking of predators, sterilants, toxic baits, selectivepiscicides, attractants and repellants, immuno-contraceptive agents, viruses, chromosomalmanipulations, gynogenesis, and transgenics. KEYWORDS Arizona, control of nuisance fishes, Gila River basin, integrated pest management,nonnative fishes, reclamation, selective removal, southwestern United States, taxon-selectivepiscicides